Advantages and Disadvantages of Settling an Atlanta Sepsis Misdiagnosis Case

Deciding whether to settle your sepsis malpractice claim can be difficult. There is no one right choice for everyone. Injured patients should thoroughly examine the facts of the case before making this type of decision.

There are several advantages and disadvantages of settling an Atlanta sepsis misdiagnosis case. If you are unsure whether you should go to trial, consider speaking with a knowledgeable attorney at our firm.

What Are the Benefits of Settling a Sepsis Misdiagnosis Case?

The main benefit of settling a sepsis misdiagnosis case is that both parties have more control in the process. Additionally, settlement negotiations typically allow both sides to resolve the issue quicker than if the claim had gone to court. Settling also provides both parties with finality.

Gaining Control in the Legal Process

In a jury trial, six or twelve jurors decide whether the injured party should receive compensation. It can be daunting to have that much uncertainty in a case. However, with a settlement, both parties have control over how the case ends. The injured patient can decide how much money he or she is willing to accept, while the at-fault party determines what he or she is willing to pay.

Resolving the Case Quicker

Going to trial is a lengthy process. The average lawsuit is not resolved until two to four years after the injured party files the case. Settling a claim can often lead to a quicker resolution.

Settlements are Final

When a case settles, it is over. The resolution is final, and neither party can take that same claim to court. When a case is tried, even if one person wins a case at trial, the other party can appeal the verdict. Then, the case could spend one or two additional years in the appellate courts. An experienced lawyer could provide injured patients with more information about the advantages of settling.

Potential Drawbacks of Settling a Case in Atlanta

One of the drawbacks of settling a sepsis malpractice case outside of court is that there is no guarantee the parties will agree on the value of the claim. No amount of money can replace what a victim of medical malpractice has lost. However, the injured party and his or her lawyer could work together to calculate all the damages and present a demand.

Patients may also be unaware that their health insurance companies are entitled to reimbursement for the medical bills they paid. The injured party may have to reimburse his or her insurance provider with the settlement money, which can come as a shock.

Common Misconceptions About Settlements

Many people believe settlements generally result in less money than a trial, but that is not always true. In a trial, the injured party could lose the case and end up with no compensation. With a settlement, the patient can be sure he or she will recover monetary damages.

Call to Learn About the Advantages and Disadvantages of Settling an Atlanta Sepsis Misdiagnosis Case

Before settling your case, you assess all the evidence of liability and calculate your damages so that you understand the value of your claim. Only after a thorough investigation can you make an informed decision on whether to settle.

A seasoned attorney at Warshauer Woodward Atkins could walk you through the advantages and disadvantages of settling an Atlanta sepsis misdiagnosis case. Contact us today to schedule a free consultation and discuss your claim.